Skip to main content

    Regulated Industries

    Link building for gambling industry

    These areas develop alongside one another. Focus on the opportunities your evidence supports, and revisit them as your business and audience change.

    Your audience and opportunity

    Earn B2B coverage with factual operational research

    Regulated gambling-sector business suppliers.

    An asset to develop: A methodology-led industry report with anonymised data.

    Have sector-specific claims reviewed and avoid consumer inducements or fabricated industry statistics.

    Develop a distinctive resource

    An asset you could build and maintain: a methodology-led industry report with anonymised data. It should help regulated gambling-sector business suppliers with earn b2b coverage with factual operational research.

    Approaches to consider

    • A possible angle, when you have evidence to support it: Documenting a software implementation process.
    • A possible angle, when you have evidence to support it: Publishing a survey with explicit sample limits.
    • A possible angle, when you have evidence to support it: Explaining a support-service workflow.
    Review rhythm
    Develop gradually as useful information, examples and editorial capacity become available.
    When to revisit
    You have new first-hand evidence, recurring reader questions or outdated material to improve.
    Evidence to watch
    The usefulness, originality and inspectability of the resource, including its sources and limitations.

    Understand relevant publishers

    Explore Industry trade editors, Professional conference organisers, Relevant technology partners. Understand their audience and editorial needs before proposing a contribution.

    Approaches to consider

    • Read relevant articles and identify the specific need your resource could address.
    • Keep notes on editorial guidelines, named contacts and contact preferences.
    • Prioritise a real, relevant audience over placement volume or a third-party score.
    Review rhythm
    Keep a small, current view of the publications and communities in your field.
    When to revisit
    A publisher changes its coverage, contacts or guidelines, or you enter a new market.
    Evidence to watch
    Recent relevant coverage, the audience served and a specific reason your contribution would help.

    Build relationships

    A useful relationship can continue well beyond one campaign or mention. Contribute knowledge and respond to genuine requests without treating every conversation as a link opportunity.

    Approaches to consider

    • Join relevant conversations with specific, accurate information.
    • Keep track of what a contact is interested in and whether they welcome further communication.
    • Respect declines and no-contact requests; avoid bulk follow-ups.
    Review rhythm
    Ongoing, guided by mutual relevance and the other person’s preferences.
    When to revisit
    A contact asks for expertise or a development is relevant to an established conversation.
    Evidence to watch
    Substantive replies, useful exchanges and repeat invitations to contribute.

    Contribute when useful

    Make a specific offer that an editor can assess on its merits. Publication timing and editorial decisions belong to the publisher.

    Approaches to consider

    • Explain the audience need, share the live resource and point to its strongest supporting evidence.
    • Disclose commercial relationships and let the editor choose wording and linking.
    • Get permission for client details, quotations and images before sharing them.
    Review rhythm
    When a credible resource and a relevant editorial opportunity coincide.
    When to revisit
    An editor needs clarification, evidence or a correction. Editorial considerations: Have sector-specific claims reviewed and avoid consumer inducements or fabricated industry statistics.
    Evidence to watch
    Editorial feedback, accurate attribution and the relevance of any resulting coverage.

    Maintain references and evaluate outcomes

    Keep cited resources accurate and available. Evaluate useful discovery and business outcomes over time, including relevant mentions that do not carry a link.

    Approaches to consider

    • Maintain stable URLs and update facts, examples and source material when they change.
    • Use a publisher’s correction process if a mention contains an error or broken destination.
    • Review referral visits and enquiries across comparable periods, allowing for seasonal demand.
    Review rhythm
    Maintain the resource continuously and review outcomes when sufficient data accumulates.
    When to revisit
    A cited fact or URL changes, new reader questions emerge, or a sustained referral pattern needs investigation.
    Evidence to watch
    Accurate live references, relevant referral traffic and attributable enquiries where your analytics can support them.